CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION
SHYAM PRAKASH PANDEY *
University of Delhi, India and Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the different provisions of constitution of India which deals with Judicial review. Under the constitution of India, the scope of judicial review has been extremely widened. Judicial review in India is based on the assumption that the constitution is the supreme law of the land and all the governmental organs, which owe their origin to the constitution and derive their powers from its provisions, must function within the framework of the constitution. Unlike the U.S.A., the constitution of India has not made express provision for judicial review. The scope of judicial review is present in several articles of the constitution, such as Article 13, 32, 141, 226 and 227. Thus, the doctrine of judicial review is firmly rooted in India and in this sense it is on a more solid footing than it is in America.
Keywords: Cestodes, Judicial review, helminth infection, constitution, Lapwingia, executive, Psittacula eupatria, legislature, judiciary
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Bengal Immunity Co. v. State of Bihar 1955 SC 661.
Golaknath v. State of Punjab 1967 SC 1643.
Shankari Prasad’ Case 1951 SC 455.
Sajan Singh Case AIR 1965 SC 845.
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India 2011 SC 1290 (1326).
Desia MD Kazhagam v. Medical Council of India 4 SCC 224 (230).
D. N. Banerjee v. P. R. Mukherjee AIR 1953 SC 58.
Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India (2011) 8 SCC 161 (220).
Gopal Das v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 300 (301).
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration AIR 1980 SC 1579.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597.
Vijaya Mehta v. State AIR 1980 Raj 207.
Maharastra Sugar Mills Case 1950 AIR 218.
Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, Bhopal 1961 AIR 182.
Daya v. Joint Chief Collector AIR 1962 SC 1796.
NOIDA Enterpreneurs Association v. NOIDA 2011 AIR SCW 3154.
Ratlam Municipality v. Vardhi Chand 1980 AIR 1622.
Chettiar v. Secretary to the Government of Madras 1939 (2) MLJ 801.
Ebrahim Abu Bakar v. Custodian- General of Evacuee Property 1952 AIR 319.
Jamalpur Arya Samaj Sabha v. Dr. D. Rama AIR 1954 Pat 297.
Niranjan Kumar Goenka v. The University of Bihar, Muzzafarpur AIR 1973 Pat 85.
Dr. Het Ram Kalia v. Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla AIR 1977 NOC 246.