ACCOUNTING FOR SUB-SOIL ASSETS IN NIGERIA: ITS IMPLICATIONS, BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

PDF

Published: 2022-10-14

Page: 1116-1127


M. S. IFURUEZE

Department of Accountancy, Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam, Nigeria.

EZECHUKWU, CLEMENTINA IFEOMA *

Department of Accountancy, Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The current study focused on accounting for sub-soil assets: Its implications, benefits, and challenges in Nigeria from the theory of comparative advantage point of view. The study employed a survey research design. Two hypotheses were formulated for the study and the one sample t-test was employed in validating the hypotheses. The study found that there is significant adoption and utilization of measurements of sub-soil assets in Shiroro Dam. The study also found that there is significant use of Analytical techniques to improve accountants’ performance in accounting for sub-soil assets. Other qualitative findings emanating from the study included the absence of green and clean sub-soil exploration activities in Nigeria which is a strong factor responsible for the agitations in the Niger-Delta regions of Nigeria. The study also discovered a strong link between accounting for subsoil assets and long-term development. Consequently, the study recommends amongst others that (IAS41-Agriculture) be adopted and maintained as a principle for measuring all costs related to biological assets to ensure proper valuation of sub-soil assets and proper disclosure of green sub-soil exploration thereby mitigating the adverse effect of oil and other sub-soil explorations in Nigeria.

Keywords: Neurosecretion, Sub-soil assets, reproduction, sub-soil resources, Barytelphusa guerini, challenges


How to Cite

IFURUEZE, M. S., and EZECHUKWU, CLEMENTINA IFEOMA. 2022. “ACCOUNTING FOR SUB-SOIL ASSETS IN NIGERIA: ITS IMPLICATIONS, BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES”. Asian Journal of Advances in Research 5 (1):1116-27. https://www.jasianresearch.com/index.php/AJOAIR/article/view/328.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World B. Where is the Wealth of Nations: Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006.

OECD. The economic significance of natural resources: key points for reformers in eastern Europe, Caucasus and central. Asia Publishing. Organization for economic co-operation and development; 2011.

Available:http://www.oecd.org/env/eap.

Mortimer J. Background and purpose of minerals’ 98 Earthwise Magazine; Published by the British Geological Survey; Issue. 1998;12:4-5.

Nwadialor IJ. Minimizing the impact of mining activities for sustainable. Mined-out area conservation in Nigeria. FUTY J Environ. 2011;6:1597-8826.

Stuivelin SJ. Natural Resource Accounting: an inventory of possibilities for SAIs. Netherlands Court of Audit; 1998.

Bassey EB, Bessong KP, Oben VO, Effiong GT. Accounting for natural resources: the Nigerian experience.GNOSI: An interdisciplinary journal of human theory and praxis. 2019;2(1).

Morgan JP. Partner in the global pursuit of sustainability. Accenture Institute for High Performance; 2008.

Sustainable aggregate resource management. (SARM, 2011). Best Practices in Quarrying. Sustainable aggregate resource management conference, september 20-22, 200. Ljubljana. Slovenia; 2011.

Wellmer FW, Becker-Platen JD. Sustainable development and exploitation of mineral and energy resources: a review. Int J Earth Sci. 2002;91:723-45.

Skinner BJ. A second Iron Age ahead? Am Sci. 1976;64:258-69.

Adiuku, Brown ME. The role of the geologist in controlling pollution and man-induced geologic hazards. Proceedings of the environmental education for sustainable development. Focus on Nigeria. Department of Arts & Social Science Education, University of Jos. Nigeria Udoh, S.U, and Akpa, G.O. (Edited). 1997b;499.

Akanwa AO, Ikegbunam FI. Natural resource exploitation in Nigeria: consequences of human actions and best practices for environmental sustainability – a review. Sparkling Int J Multidiscip Res Stud; 2019.

ISSN 2581-7574.

Moshi PBH. Opportunities and challenges for the extraction of natural gas in Tanzania: TheImperative of adequate preparedness. Afr J Econ Rev. 2014;I1.

Richards JP. Challenges for Sustainable Mineral Resources Development in the 21st Century Resource Geology. 2005;55(2):137.

Adekoya JA. Negative environmental impact of mineral exploitation in Nigeria. Proceedings of the regional training workshop on impact of human activities on the west African savanna, held at the federal university of technology, Akure, Nigeria. United nations educational, scientific and cultural organization - MAB Sponsored; 1995.

Honda K. Monitoring of revegetation area in Asio devastated land – How expensive and difficult to restore the destructed forest. Asian J Remote Sens. 1991;l(l):127-8.

Adiuku, Brown ME. Geology related environmental issues: the situation as it affects Nigeria. Proceedings of the environmental education for sustainable development: focus on Nigeria. Nigeria: Department of Arts & Social Science Education, University of Jos. Udoh SU, Akpa GO. (Edited). 1997a;499.

Adiuku-Brown ME, Ogazi AE. Heavy metal pollution:from mining practices: A case study of Zurak. J Min Geol. 1991;27(2):205-11.

Ricardo D. The works and correspondence of David Ricardo PieroSraffa, Dobbs M, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1951;I-XI.

United Nations (UN). Glossary of environment statistics, studies in methods, series F. New York: United Nations. 1997;67.